Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. SCI
  3. SCI期刊
  4. What is socio-ecological research delivering? A literature survey across 25 international LTSER platforms
 
  • Details

What is socio-ecological research delivering? A literature survey across 25 international LTSER platforms

Journal
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
622
Pages
1225-1240
Date Issued
2018-05
Date
2018-05
Author(s)
Jan, Dick
Orenstein, Daniel E.
Holzer, Jennifer M.
Christoph, Wohner
Achard, Anne-Laure
Christopher, Andrews
Noa, Avriel-Avni
Pedro, Beja
Nadège, Blond
Javier, Cabello
Chiling, Chen 
Ricardo, Díaz-Delgado
Giannakis, Georgios V.
Simone, Gingrich
Zita, Izakovicova
Kinga, Krauze
Nicolas, Lamouroux
Stefan, Leca
Viesturs, Melecis
Kertész, Miklós
Maria, Mimikou
Georg, Niedrist
Christophe, Piscart
Carmen, Postolache
Alexander, Psomas
Margarida, Santos-Reis
Ulrike, Tappeiner
Kristin, Vanderbilt
Gunther, Van Ryckegem
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.324
URI
https://scholars.tari.gov.tw/handle/123456789/6699
Abstract
With an overarching goal of addressing global and regional sustainability challenges, Long Term Socio-Ecological Research Platforms (LTSER) aim to conduct place-based research, to collect and synthesize both environmental and socio-economic data, and to involve a broader stakeholder pool to set the research agenda. To date there have been few studies examining the output from LTSER platforms. In this study we enquire if the socio-ecological research from 25 self-selected LTSER platforms of the International Long-Term Ecological Research (ILTER) network has produced research products which fulfil the aims and ambitions of the paradigm shift from ecological to socio-ecological research envisaged at the turn of the century. In total we assessed 4983 publically available publications, of which 1112 were deemed relevant to the socio-ecological objectives of the platform. A series of 22 questions were scored for each publication, assessing relevance of responses in terms of the disciplinary focus of research, consideration of human health and well-being, degree of stakeholder engagement, and other relevant variables. The results reflected the diverse origins of the individual platforms and revealed a wide range in foci, temporal periods and quantity of output from participating platforms, supporting the premise that there is a growing trend in socio-ecological research at long-term monitoring platforms. Our review highlights the challenges of realizing the top-down goal to harmonize international network activities and objectives and the need for bottom-up, self-definition for research platforms. This provides support for increasing the consistency of LTSER research while preserving the diversity of regional experiences.
Subjects
ILTER
Place-based
Transdisciplinary
Sustainability
Socio-ecology
LTER
Publisher
Elsevier
Type
journal article

新系統部份功能仍在調整中

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback