https://scholars.tari.gov.tw/handle/123456789/2901
Title: | 茶樹育種個體選拔芽葉農藝性狀及化學指標之研究 | Other Titles: | Studies on the Agronomic Characters and Chemical Component of Fresh Tea Leaf to Assist Progeny Selection in Tea Breeding Programs | Authors: | 陳坤龍 李淑美 |
Issue Date: | Aug-1997 | Publisher: | 農業試驗所 | Related Publication(s): | 農業試驗所特刊第74號 | Start page/Pages: | 273-274 | Source: | 1997特用作物試驗成果研討會專刊 | Conference: | 1997特用作物試驗成果研討會 Proceedings of A Symposium on the Experimental Results of Special Crops 1997 |
Abstract: | 本研究利用目前主要栽培品種希望建立一套扦插苗及實生苗幼木期鮮葉主要生化成分成茶滋味之關係,並調查其芽葉農藝性狀,作為選拔標準,輔助育種選拔工作。以本場試驗茶園之青心烏龍、青心大冇、台茶12號、台茶13號等品種為參考材料,第一年計畫於春、夏、秋三季分析鮮葉中之多元酣、氨基酸、咖啡因及可溶分含量,並調查其芽葉農藝性狀,結果概述如后: (1)芽葉農藝性狀: 1)間徑、節間長等性狀在季節間以春季最小,品種間可概分兩群青心大冇、台茶12號略大於青心烏龍、台茶13號;葉厚亦以春季較薄,台茶13號最厚。 2)葉長、葉寬及葉面積,在季節間以夏季最大,品種間則以青心烏龍最小。 (1)生化成分: 1)元酣含量在季節間以夏季最高,品種間差異不大。 2)氨基酸含量高低在季節間依序為春、秋、夏,品種間則以青心烏龍較佳且在各季節間的含量較為平均,差異不大。 3)咖啡因含量在季節間以夏季最高,品種間則以青心烏龍的含量較低。 4)可溶分含量高低在季節間依序為夏、秋、春,品種間的差異不大。 This study aimed at forming reference standards. The selection standards were formulated based on the inter-relationships among tasting quality of made tea chemical components of fresh leaves either from tea-cutting or seed-sowing seedlings, and agronomic characters. This experiment was conducted at Taiwan Tea Experimental Station, the first year result for this project has obtained date regarding chemical component contents of fresh tea leaf, including total polyphenol, total amino acids, caffeine and soluble solids. In addition, agronomic characters of fresh tea leaf from four cultivars Chinshin Oolong, Chinshin Dapang, TTES NO.12 and TTES NO.13 have also been recorded, respectively. The experimental results are summarized as follows: 1. Agronomic characters of fresh tea leaf: 1)nternode diameter and Internode length: Spring tea had the shortest, and Chinshin Dapang, TTES NO.12 slight longer than that of Chinshin Oolong and TTES NO.13. Leaf thickness: Spring tea got the thinnest and TTES NO.13 got the thickest. 2) Leaf length, leaf width and leaf area: Summer tea got the largest and Chinshin Oolong got the least. 2. Chemical component contents: 1) otal polyphenol contents: Summer tea got the highest, whereas there were no difference among tested cultivars. 2) Total amino acid contents followed the order: Spring tea>Autumn tea> Summer tea, and Chinshin Oolong got the better content, but no differ ence among Seasons. 3) Caffeine contents: Summer tea got the highest and Chinshin Oolong got the lower. 4) Soluble solids contents followed the order: Summer tea>Autumn tea> Spring tea, and no difference among entries. |
URI: | https://scholars.tari.gov.tw/handle/123456789/2901 | ISBN: | 957-02-1964-5 |
Appears in Collections: | 作物組 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
publication_no74-31.pdf | 153.3 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.