https://scholars.tari.gov.tw/handle/123456789/4644
Title: | 土壤植物寄生性線蟲分離方法之優劣比較 | Other Titles: | The comparison of three nematode-extraction methods on four selected nematodes | Authors: | 顏志恆 李明達 陳殿義 林俊義 蔡東纂 Yen, J.H. Lee, M.D. Chen, D.Y. Lin, C.Y. Tsay, T.T. |
Keywords: | 改良式柏門氏漏斗分離法;離心懸浮法;懸浮網篩技術;回收率;modified Baermann funnel method;centrifugal-flotation method;flotation-sieving technique;recovery rate | Issue Date: | Apr-1998 | Publisher: | 植物保護學會 | Journal Volume: | 40 | Journal Issue: | 2 | Start page/Pages: | 153-162 | Source: | 植物保護學會會刊 | Abstract: | 比較不同土壤植物寄生性線蟲分離方法一改良式柏門氏漏斗分離法(modified Baermann funnel method)、離心懸浮法(centrifugal-flotation method)、及懸浮網篩技術(flotation-sieving technique),針對不同的土壤質地(砂質土及砂質壤土)、不同種類與不同體形大小的供試線蟲(南方根瘤線蟲二齡幼蟲、南方根腐線蟲、葉芽線蟲、及腐生線蟲)及線蟲的活性(活線蟲及死線蟲)作比較,以回收率(recovery Rate)及所需時間(time)作為測試項目。其試驗結果顯示,在回收率及所需時間方面,離心懸浮法及懸浮網篩技術優於改良式柏門氏漏斗分離法。因此推薦使用懸浮離心法及懸浮網篩技術,作為土壤植物寄生性線蟲的分離方法。 The comparison of three nematode-extraction methods (modified Baermann funnel method, centrifugal-flotation method, and flotation-sieving technique) on four selected nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita, Pralylenchus coffeae, Aphelenchoides besseyi, and free-living nematode) has been conducted. The results showed that the recovery rates and required time in nematode extraction of centrifugal-flotation method and flotation-sieving technique are greater than of modified Baermann funnel method. |
URI: | https://scholars.tari.gov.tw/handle/123456789/4644 https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A98015636 |
ISSN: | 0577-750X |
Appears in Collections: | (4)植物病理組 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
40-2-153-162.pdf | 866.76 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.